Re: Libera interviews collection
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:36 am
I look forward to the recording as well
The Libera Dreams Discussion Forum
http://libera-dreams.co.uk/
Reading your post here makes me want to go listen to that interview again. And I do agree that John does know which questions to ask them. Two interviews hosted by him (US Summer Tour 2017 & 2018) give great insights and are able to answer a lot of my questions. As a person working in the same "field", he has knowledge about and possibly knows that we expect answers on and discussions about these matters.filiarheni wrote: ↑<span title="Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:05 pm">6 years ago</span> From all Libera interviews I've heard so far, this is the best. It's very informative as well as funny, which is also the interviewer's - John Romeri - merit who knows how to ask them good questions and is just very nice with all of them. He actually seems to enjoy their company, too.
I didn't realize there are so many topics until you pointed it out. Very interesting ones!filiarheni wrote: ↑<span title="Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:05 pm">6 years ago</span> Other topics were the overlaps and differences of Libera and the church choir, the situation of boys choirs in the UK, the different behaviour and situation of choir boys and girls, voice change, voice ranges, a comparison of the audience's responses in concerts depending on the country and more.
The rolling "r"s, at least in English choirs, is only performed by the Trebles/boys - the adult singers don't do that. I think it is supposed to make the "r" stand out in a church setting because otherwise it is a pretty weak sound in English. But it is not done by the adults. A good example of this is Aled Jones where he sings the same song as an adult layered with his performance as a chorister:filiarheni wrote: ↑<span title="Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:18 pm">5 years ago</span>
Robert stated that rolled "r"s would result in a kind of barrier on the listeners and that he couldn't say why. I assume that such overly pronounced "r"s are more assigned to adult singers by many people, as a maybe too high-trained, too artificial way of singing to be appropriate for a child. So I think a discrepancy is felt which leads to an unpleasant feeling. As if a child was made an adult too early. I don't say that it is that way, but it's enough when it is felt that way.
Hm, are we speaking of different things? I mean this:
A rolled "r" makes it easier to keep the voice in the front (shining sound) and not fall back into the throat (mat sound). And yes, it also gives more profile to the language and thus helps the listener to understand the words better in classical singing.