Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 12:46 am
Wow....I need to catch up on some serous reading...I could be reading right now...but instead I'm on the forum posting about reading. Brilliant.
The Libera Dreams Discussion Forum
http://libera-dreams.co.uk/
Agreed. One of the things I'm most looking forward to after graduation is being able to read for pleasure again. Right now, I've got such thrilling works open as— well, actually, they don't seem so bad. And they aren't. It's just that something grows far less enjoyable when it's being read for thesis fodder. Novels, these books are not.symphonica7 wrote:Wow....I need to catch up on some serous reading...I could be reading right now...but instead I'm on the forum posting about reading. Brilliant.
I feel you on that....LOL. The last book I read from cover to cover was probably 7 years ago..........seriously, not cool....it was "The Giver" great book by the way. What is your major???liberavieve wrote:Agreed. One of the things I'm most looking forward to after graduation is being able to read for pleasure again. Right now, I've got such thrilling works open as— well, actually, they don't seem so bad. And they aren't. It's just that something grows far less enjoyable when it's being read for thesis fodder. Novels, these books are not.symphonica7 wrote:Wow....I need to catch up on some serous reading...I could be reading right now...but instead I'm on the forum posting about reading. Brilliant.
Seven years is a long time, but The Giver is so fantastic a book that I could understand not wanting to read anything after that, for fear that it would fall flat.symphonica7 wrote:I feel you on that....LOL. The last book I read from cover to cover was probably 7 years ago..........seriously, not cool....it was "The Giver" great book by the way. What is your major???
That's how I am with the Harry Potter series. I haven't been able to finish a single book after I read them a few years ago.liberavieve wrote:Seven years is a long time, but The Giver is so fantastic a book that I could understand not wanting to read anything after that, for fear that it would fall flat.symphonica7 wrote:I feel you on that....LOL. The last book I read from cover to cover was probably 7 years ago..........seriously, not cool....it was "The Giver" great book by the way. What is your major???
Touche my friend, touche...."The Giver" left an impression on me, I still feel 7 years later...Rebecca (: wrote:That's how I am with the Harry Potter series. I haven't been able to finish a single book after I read them a few years ago.liberavieve wrote:Seven years is a long time, but The Giver is so fantastic a book that I could understand not wanting to read anything after that, for fear that it would fall flat.symphonica7 wrote:I feel you on that....LOL. The last book I read from cover to cover was probably 7 years ago..........seriously, not cool....it was "The Giver" great book by the way. What is your major???
I've tried but nothing keeps me interested anymore. I've always had troubles reading, because I can't stay focused for more than a page, but I really do enjoy it!
Nice....I've always found the subject of Sociology intriguing....but it's way too much for my brain to handle at the moment...and my mind. LOL. Nah, but that's really cool...very interesting..so have you come closer to a conclusion on any of those subjects yet???I'm doing an undergrad course in Social Anthropology. Now that I'm a bit more specialised and am working on a paper of my own, I'm finding my reading a bit more interesting (The Child in the Educative Process, How High Should Boys Sing?, Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales!); but before—? I shudder to think. Awful, awful stuff, a lot of it. And thousands of pages weekly. I'm I'm completely honest, I burnt out halfway through my first year.
If only my work post-graduation could be lounging in bed and reading novels all day!
_________________
Given the subject matter of previous books I was left wondering about 'The Giver'. Thankfully it looks like an interesting kids book - 1984 meets Logan's Run.symphonica7 wrote:I feel you on that....LOL. The last book I read from cover to cover was probably 7 years ago..........seriously, not cool....it was "The Giver" great book by the way. What is your major???liberavieve wrote:Agreed. One of the things I'm most looking forward to after graduation is being able to read for pleasure again. Right now, I've got such thrilling works open as— well, actually, they don't seem so bad. And they aren't. It's just that something grows far less enjoyable when it's being read for thesis fodder. Novels, these books are not.symphonica7 wrote:Wow....I need to catch up on some serous reading...I could be reading right now...but instead I'm on the forum posting about reading. Brilliant.
Your friends at CTCC really hate that one:liberavieve wrote: I'm doing an undergrad course in Social Anthropology. Now that I'm a bit more specialised and am working on a paper of my own, I'm finding my reading a bit more interesting (The Child in the Educative Process, How High Should Boys Sing?, Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales!);!
I noticed that. And I still can't be entirely sure as to why.Yorkie wrote:Your friends at CTCC really hate that one.
Well, from what I read it was because the author approached the subject matter with a pre-formed agenda (the opposite of theirs) - that there is no difference between a girls and boys voice when singing. In support of that claim he quoted a couple of previous studies in to that matter which the author claimed supported his/her position.liberavieve wrote:I noticed that. And I still can't be entirely sure as to why.Yorkie wrote:Your friends at CTCC really hate that one.
I can understand why the CTCC would take issue with that particular agenda—what group wouldn't snarl at a thesis diametrically opposite its own?—but having read the book through now, I don't think that that is Ashley's agenda. Not at all, actually. He certainly does have an agenda—namely, that the old thought that 'boys won't sing for fear of sounding like girls' doesn't quite explain boys' real reluctance to sing—but proving the equality of boys' and girls' treble voices is not it.Yorkie wrote:...the author approached the subject matter with a pre-formed agenda (the opposite of theirs) - that there is no difference between a girls and boys voice when singing.
This is what Mark Twain meant by 'lies, damned lies and statistics.' I've read quite a handful of voice-related studies now, some prepared directly in relation to chorister voices, some not; and I think I've seen all of them cited in other sources in such ways as to reach completely different conclusions. If Ashley is guilty of this (which he might very well be), then so are the CTCC and every other group who have cited any of this research. It's just how statistics go, and that is by no means restricted to the discussion of voice.Yorkie wrote:However, in other pieces (quoted above), CTCC members looked at that research and pointed out the flaws in the methodology and also in the mis-reporting of the conclusions. They hold that even the flawed studies, when examined in the correct statistical way, prove that people can detect a difference between girl and boy choristers.
Well, I can't argue with them on the writing style front; first-person narrative just doesn't often work well in texts like these, and it doesn't work for this book. I'd be throttled for submitting something like that.Yorkie wrote:So, they dislike the authors belief, writing style and misuse of research.
Hey MurkskisMurkskis wrote:Alexandre Dumas (French writer) 'The Three Musketeers' - excellent book ! Historical. It sells you war and duelling as an adventure and fun thing. You can take some 'lessons on loyalty' of this book![]()
Do you know who wrote it? Sounds interesting.BrightEyes wrote:
2. "The Terror" - about Sir John Franklin's 1847 expedition to the Arctic to search for a Northwest Passage. Very frightening explanation for the disappearance of every soul on two Royal Navy ships "The Erebus" and "The Terror".